AttoBahn markets itself as a next-generation “mobile internet” that’s wireless and fiberless, delivering “over 20 Gbps” to each end user while bypassing TCP/IP—the core protocol stack of today’s internet. (attobahn.com)
In parallel, its shareholder materials and emails pitch a different (often shifting) story: data-center “DataGrid” infrastructure, licensing deals in the hundreds of millions, and a commercialization timeline that doesn’t cleanly match the readiness levels they claim.
Below are the Top 10 glaring inconsistencies across the website, shareholder reports, and emails uploaded by users.
1) Speed claims that don’t agree with each other (20 Gbps vs 500 Gbps vs “terabits”)
- Website: “over 20 Gbps… to each end user.” (attobahn.com)
- Website: “speeds… up to 20 Gbps.” (attobahn.com)
- Separate Attobahn domain: “500 Gbps speed and sub-microsecond latency.” (attobahn.net)
- Their own milestone email: “15GB in 11 seconds” (≈10.9 Gbps) and also references very high frequency ranges (95 GHz–3.3 THz).
Why it matters: extraordinary claims can be true in lab demos, but when the headline numwn channels, it signals marketing-first messaging.
2) “Zamaniwave” is a joint venture… except it “is not a company”
- Feb 2026 shareholder report: entry into Nigeria “structured… through Zamaniwave… as a joint venture with native partners.”
- “**Zamaniwave is not a company
That’s not a nuance. Either it’s a JV vehicle or it isn’t.
3) $600M “secured l$500M “pathway”
- July 2025 shareholder report: “signed a Letter of Intent for a $500M licensing agreement.”
- Milestone email: “Secured Our First Licensing Contr
- Feb 2026 shareholder report: a $2M convertible note is the “entry point” to a “pathw
LOI ≠ contract ≠ pathway. They use all threhile still “75% through Alpha” in 2026
- Milestone email lists “Stage TR7 – System Prototype demonstration in an operational environment” (Sept 2024).
- Feb 2026 shareholder report: “approximately 75% through Alpha, completion targeted for
- July 2025 shareholder report: “Alpha MVP… *
If you’re truly TRL/“TR7” in 2024, you don’t normally years later.
5) “Bypasses TCP/IP” (website) vs patent text that talks about carrying TCP/IP
- Website: “bypasses traditional TCP/IP methods.” (attobahn.com)
- Patent publication text (public): describes accommodating “older data applications like TCP/IP” traversing the network. (Google Patents)
They’re simultaneously selling “no TCP/IP” and “TCP/IP works over it.” Those are different architectures with different implications.
6) The “15GB in 11 seconds” comparison is stacked with a ridiculous baseline
- Milestone email: “15GB… in 11 seconds… versus the existing internet’s protocol of 6.5–8 hours.”
This reads like a marketing trick unless they provide the exact baseline setup (link speed, endpoints, congestion, server limits). “The internet takes 6–8 hours” isn’t a meaningful comparator.
7) “FCCe validation of their tech
- Their milestone list implies FCC “Spectrum Horizons” “paves the way” for their system across 95 GHz–3 THz.
- FCC’s actual Spectrum Horizons framework is experimental licensing rules above 95 GHz (designed to encourage experimentation). (Federal Communications Commission)
Experimental licensing iswide commercial deployment.
8) “Nationwide mobile broadband” language vs what their own docs describe (data-center grid + licensing)
- Website is consumer-telco framed: “mobile internet,” “each end user,” “user is the hotspot.” (attobahn.com)
- Shareholder reports emphasize an “IaaS DataGrid,” enterprise infrastructure, governance, and licensing strategy.
It’s not impossible to be both—but the public story reads like a retail broadband revolution while the investor story reads like an enterprise infrastructure platform.
9) “Revenue-positive” is tidopter Convertible Note**.”
Calling financing-like instruments “revenue-positive” is a credibility problem unless they separate operating revenue from structured commitments with clean accounting clarity.
10) Ultra-low latency claims collide with basic physics and unclear scope
- Attoba transmission medium.” (attobahn.net)
- July 2025 shareholder report: “nanosecond latency.”
Nanoseconds/sub-microsecond can be plausible inside a box/rack. It becomes implausible when implied across a wide-area “mobile internet.” Their materials don’t consistently define the measurement scope.
Leave a Reply